tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32595888.post6057172374039593451..comments2023-10-17T16:05:59.282+01:00Comments on radical royalist: radical royalisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00438964016034979338noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32595888.post-28572042393993879502010-01-18T22:07:50.261+00:002010-01-18T22:07:50.261+00:00The Shah was a modernizer that was pissing off the...The Shah was a modernizer that was pissing off the mullahs. Khomeini's voice always came out when HIM made major changes in society, specialy during the White Revoltion. When he emancipated women, Khomeini spoke, argumenting that was against the Sharia Law. When HIM took lands from mullahs that did not invest on the lands, he took the deeds from them and distribuited to the peasents, so they would be land owners and have there own business and help the economy and themselvs. Once again Khomeini spoke, targeting HIM to be stealing from the religious men. And much much more. <br />At the end of the day, HIM Shahanshah Aryamehr suffered a treason from his allies, USA and British, because he was raising the price of oil and refused to lower it. HIM said on television in 1978 that in the following year he would not sign the anglo-iranian oil company and make oil national. Guess what happened before he did it...the "Revoltion". And the person who came to power was so much televised by the BBC and portraited as Ghandi. When bringing Khomeini to power, the oil price came down from 22$/barel to 6$/barel. Now tell me who had profits with the "1979 revoltion". <br /><br />He was betrayed, but history will show the truth sooner or later.<br /><br />Viva IRAN!Mahakalihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14519881077018430120noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32595888.post-79166576715104318382009-06-25T18:33:50.447+01:002009-06-25T18:33:50.447+01:00It is a very old story when it comes to monarchs v...It is a very old story when it comes to monarchs vs tyrants. King Charles I was often criticized for being too lenient and not following up his victories but he always thought that they just needed a smack on the hand to come to their senses. And that was during a war. Even as far afield as Vietnam the last Emperor of that country refused help from the Japanese against the communists because he would not kill his own people. Monarchs view themselves as father or mother of their people whereas tyrants view 'the people' as tools to manipulate for their own advantage.MadMonarchisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08083008336883267870noreply@blogger.com